Legale kindontvoering

29.3.2012
Update: In november 2014 we finally were victorious, severe violations of the social workers were finally exposed by an independent expert and court ruled the the children must be returned immediately.

Article about the legal victory: www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11248178/Twins-returned-to-family-after-32-months-of-hell-spent-in-care.html

Original situation:

My brother & sister were kidnapped by a Dutch privatized social services, 2 year and 4 months ego.

The responsible organization is: Bureau Jeugdzorg.
Later the whole case got outsourced to Salvation Army, because Bureau Jeugdzorg wanted to get rid of it.

My mother and me are still fighting the entire Dutch government to get the children back.
Our case already reached the European Parliament because we had hard evidences that Bureau Jeugdzorg violated many human rights and EU laws.

All the details about our case are below, including the links to big news articles in the Sunday Telegraph ( UK ). It mentions our victory in Dutch court of appeals, and what kind of illegal trick Social workers pulled to be able to continue keeping my brother and sister ( 11 years old, Twins ) hostage.

This organisation destroyed thousands of families ( Dutch & other nationalities ) in the last couple of years with soul purpose to keep the figures of children in foster care on very high level to secure full government funding. The reason that they so far could get away with their systematic child abduction, is because Dutch child judges do not apply truth findings ( do not check evidences ) in Bureau Jeugdzorg cases.

About 6 months ego evidence had leaked that Bureau Jeugdzorg has special secret agreements with Dutch child judges, the agreements are basically that child judges automatically approve everything what Bureau jeugdzorg is demanding without checking evidences. So parents and lawyers are powerless and entire court hearings are just for the show. So there is severe corruption.

Reasons Dutch privatized social services used to get permission to remove the children from their house:

1. At home Russian was the main language, child services considered it not in children's interest
2. Child services had suspicion that mother would emigrate from Holland
3. Children had conflict of loyalty